Atlas 2.0 and 3.6 are two different engine options for the Volkswagen Atlas SUV. The Atlas 2.0 engine is a turbocharged four-cylinder engine, while the Atlas 3.6 engine is a larger, more powerful V6 engine. The engine affects the fuel economy of the vehicle, so it is important to know what the difference in gas mileage between the two engines is to make an informed decision when purchasing a Volkswagen Atlas.
The EPA estimates the fuel economy of the Atlas 2.0 engine at 21/26 mpg city/highway. The Atlas 3.6 engine has an EPA-estimated fuel economy of 18/23 mpg city/highway. This means that the Atlas 2.0 engine is more fuel-efficient than the 3.6 engine, and it can help you save money on fuel costs.
The Atlas 2.0 engine is more fuel-efficient because it is smaller and lighter than the 3.6 engine. The 2.0 engine has a displacement of 2.0 liters and produces 235 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque, while the 3.6 engine has a displacement of 3.6 liters and produces 276 horsepower and 266 pound-feet of torque. The 3.6 engine is larger and heavier, so it requires more fuel to produce the same amount of power.
The difference in fuel economy between the Atlas 2.0 and Atlas 3.6 engine is significant, and it can help you save money on fuel costs. The Atlas 2.0 engine is more fuel-efficient and can help you save money over the long term. However, the Atlas 3.6 engine has more power and torque, so it may be better for those who are looking for more performance from their vehicle.
Atlas 2.0 Vs Atlas 3.6: Gas Mileage Comparison
Atlas 2.0 and 3.6 are both Volkswagen Atlas models released in 2021. The two models offer different gas mileage, depending on the engine and other factors. In this post, we’ll take a look at the differences between Atlas 2.0 and 3.6 gas mileage.
The 2021 Volkswagen Atlas 2.0 is powered by a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine. This engine produces 235 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque and is paired with an eight-speed automatic transmission. The estimated EPA fuel efficiency rating for this engine is 21 mpg city, 24 highway, and 22 combined.
The 2021 Volkswagen Atlas 3.6, on the other hand, is powered by a 3.6-liter V6 engine. This engine produces 276 horsepower and 266 lb-ft of torque and is paired with an eight-speed automatic transmission. The estimated EPA fuel efficiency rating for this engine is 17 mpg city, 22 highway, and 19 combined.
In terms of cost, the Atlas 2.0 starts at $32,545, while the Atlas 3.6 starts at $34,995. In terms of features, the Atlas 2.0 comes standard with a rearview camera, heated front seats, and a 6.5-inch touchscreen display. The Atlas 3.6 comes standard with a panoramic sunroof, leather upholstery, and an 8-inch touchscreen display.
Below is a table summarizing the differences between Atlas 2.0 and 3.6 gas mileage:
| Model | Engine | Fuel Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
| Atlas 2.0 | 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder | 21 mpg city, 24 highway, and 22 combined |
| Atlas 3.6 | 3.6-liter V6 | 17 mpg city, 22 highway, and 19 combined |
The 2021 Volkswagen Atlas 2.0 and 3.6 offer significantly different gas mileage, depending on the engine and other factors. The Atlas 2.0 offers better overall fuel efficiency, while the Atlas 3.6 is slightly more powerful and more feature-rich. Ultimately, it’s up to you to decide which model is best for your needs.
Exploring The Differences In Fuel Economy Between Atlas 2.0 And 3.6
When it comes to fuel economy, the Volkswagen Atlas 2.0 and 3.6 are two of the most popular models on the market today. Both vehicles offer excellent efficiency, but there are a few key differences between the two that can help you decide which is right for your needs.
The first key difference between Atlas 2.0 and 3.6 gas mileage is the engine size. The 2.0 is powered by a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 235 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque. The 3.6 is powered by a naturally aspirated 3.6-liter V6 engine that produces 276 horsepower and 266 pound-feet of torque. The difference in engine power translates to a difference in fuel economy as well.
The EPA estimates the 2.0 to get 22 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway, while the 3.6 is rated at 18 mpg in the city and 25 mpg on the highway. The difference in fuel economy is significant, and you can expect the 3.6 to take more trips to the gas station than the 2.0.
The price of the Atlas 2.0 and 3.6 also differs significantly, with the 2.0 being more affordable than the 3.6. The 2.0 starts at $31,895, while the 3.6 starts at $35,095. That’s not a huge difference in price, but it can start to add up when you factor in fuel costs.
To make the right decision for your lifestyle, it’s important to consider the features that come with each model. The 2.0 offers a variety of features that are designed to make it an even more efficient vehicle. It has an eight-speed automatic transmission, stop/start technology, and an optional all-wheel-drive system. The 3.6 also has an eight-speed automatic transmission, but it does not offer stop/start technology or all-wheel-drive.
At the end of the day, both of these vehicles have excellent fuel economy and both will get you where you need to go. However, the differences in engine size, fuel economy, features, and price are all critical factors to consider when trying to decide which model is right for you.
Atlas 2.0 vs. 3.6: Comparison Table
| Model | Engine | Horsepower | Torque | MPG (City/Highway) | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas 2.0 | 2.0-liter four-cylinder | 235 hp | 258 lb-ft | 22/26 mpg | $31,895 |
| Atlas 3.6 | 3.6-liter V6 | 276 hp | 266 lb-ft | 18/25 mpg | $35,095 |
The Atlas 2.0 has better gas mileage at an EPA-estimated 20 city and 25 highway mpg, compared to the 3.6, which has an EPA-estimated 17 city and 23 highway mpg.
The 2.0 has better fuel economy with an EPA-estimated 20 city and 25 highway mpg, compared to the 3.6, which has an EPA-estimated 17 city and 23 highway mpg.
The Atlas 2.0 has an EPA-estimated 20 city and 25 highway mpg.
The Atlas 3.6 has an EPA-estimated 17 city and 23 highway mpg.
Yes, the Atlas 2.0 has better gas mileage with an EPA-estimated 20 city and 25 highway mpg, compared to the 3.6, which has an EPA-estimated 17 city and 23 highway mpg.
The Atlas 2.0 has better fuel economy with an EPA-estimated 20 city and 25 highway mpg, compared to the 3.6, which has an EPA-estimated 17 city and 23 highway mpg.
The Atlas 2.0 has an EPA-estimated 20 city and 25 highway mpg, while the 3.6 has an EPA-estimated 17 city and 23 highway mpg.
No, the Atlas 2.0 has better fuel economy with an EPA-estimated 20 city and 25 highway mpg, compared to the 3.6, which has an EPA-estimated 17 city and 23 highway mpg.
The Atlas 2.0 has an EPA-estimated 20 city and 25 highway mpg, while the 3.6 has an EPA-estimated 17 city and 23 highway mpg.
The Atlas 2.0 has an EPA-estimated 20 city and 25 highway mpg, while the 3.6 has an EPA-estimated 17 city and 23 highway mpg.
Yes, the Atlas 2.0 has better fuel efficiency with an EPA-estimated 20 city and 25 highway mpg, compared to the 3.6, which has an EPA-estimated 17 city and 23 highway mpg.
